PlanningWiki
      Home     Forums     Gallery     PlanningWiki     Resource Directory     Site of the Day     Voices     Bookstore     Gear
You must be a registered user to post and edit PlanningWiki articles. Cyburbia Forums members can log in with their regular username and password.

Go back   Cyburbia Forums | Urban Planning Community > PlanningWiki

PlanningWiki:Proposed categories

From PlanningWiki

Revision as of 13:40, 29 August 2009; view current revision
←Older revision | Newer revision→

This page is to list suggested broad categories for PlanningWiki articles. For general guidelines, see the Wikipedia Categorization page.

Contents

When to use categories

Categories help users find information, even if they don't know that it exists or what it's called.

Every page in the article namespace should belong to at least one category. Categories should be major topics that are likely to be useful to someone reading the article.

Article: Portable signs
Useful categories: Category:Signs Category:Zoning
Not useful: Things that are ugly and should be banned

Questions to ask to determine whether it is appropriate to add an article to a category:

  • If the category does not already exist, is it possible to write a few paragraphs or more on the subject of the category, explaining it?
  • If you go to the article from the category, will it be obvious why the article was put in the category? Is the category subject prominently discussed in the article?

If the answer to either of these questions is no, then the category is probably inappropriate. Note that it is always appropriate to add articles to categories that fit into well established taxonomies.

Guidelines

Some general guidelines

1. Categories are mainly used to browse through similar articles. Make decisions about the structure of categories and subcategories that make it easy for users to browse through similar articles.

2. An article will often be in several categories. Restraint should be used as categories become less effective the more there are on any given article.

3. Check to see where siblings of the article reside. If there are few if any articles in a category, the article probably belongs in one of the subcategories.

3. Articles should be placed in categories with the same name. However, the article and the category do not have to be categorized the same way. The article can also be placed in categories populated with similar articles. The category can be put into categories populated with similar subcategories.

4. There are often occasions when articles might ideally be moved from a category to two or more of its subcategories, but not all of the subcategories exist. In such cases consider creating the additional subcategories, but if you decide not to do so, leave the articles in the parent category for the time being.

5. Bend the rules above when it makes sense, but only if no other solution can be found.

6. Categories appear without annotations, so be careful of neutral point of view when creating or filling categories. Unless it is self-evident and uncontroversial that something belongs in a category, it should not be put into a category. A list might be a better option.

7. If you don't know where to put an article, don't worry about it. Instead of adding a category, use the Template:Tl tag to bring attention to the article. Editors who love to categorize articles will find a good home for your article.

Categories do not form a tree

Each Wikipedia article can appear in more than one category, and each category can appear in more than one parent category. Multiple categorization schemes co-exist simultaneously. In other words, categories do not form a strict hierarchy or tree structure, but a more general directed acyclic graph.

Nevertheless, parts of the category graph will be tree-like, and it may be convenient to think of parts of the category graph as being like multiple overlapping trees. When applying the guidelines above, consider each tree to be independent of the overlapping trees. A person browsing through a hierarchy should find every article that belongs in that hierarchy. This can lead to a good deal of debate as to what the hierarchies actually are. To clarify the structure of the hierarchy and help people browse through it, you can add a classification to each category.

Proposed category scheme

Please feel free to add to this list. Remember the guidelines above.

  • [Academics]
  • Agricultural land use
  • Architecture
  • Books
  • Capital improvement programming
  • Career development
  • Case law
  • Central business districts
  • Citizen participation
  • City Beautiful
  • Commercial land use
  • Commissions and boards
  • Community development
  • Comprehensive planning
  • Computer software
  • Consultants
  • Consulting and private practice
  • Contextualism
  • Demographics
  • Development types
  • Disaster and mitigation planning
  • Diversity
  • Economic development
  • Environmental design
  • Environmental justice
  • Environmental planning
  • Ethics
  • Finance
  • Garden city movement
  • Geographic information systems
  • Global planning
  • Green infrastructure
  • Growth management
  • Historic preservation
  • Housing
  • Industrial land use
  • Influential planners and urbanists
  • Information technology
  • Infrastructure
  • Land development
  • Landscape architecture
  • Legislation
  • Management
  • Mapping
  • Message boards and mailing lists
  • Mining
  • Neighborhood planning
  • New Urbanism
  • New town movement
  • Notable places
  • Organizations
  • Parks and recreation planning
  • Placemaking
  • Places
  • Planning administration
  • Planning history
  • Planning education
  • Planning management and finance
  • Planning methods
  • Planning movements
  • Planning periodicals
  • Planning legislation in Australia
  • Planning legislation in Canada
  • Planning legislation in Ireland
  • Planning legislation in New Zealand
  • Planning legislation in South Africa
  • Planning legislation in the United Kingdom
  • Planning legislation in the United States
  • Planning process in Australia
  • Planning process in Canada
  • Planning process in Ireland
  • Planning process in New Zealand
  • Planning process in South Africa
  • Planning process in the United Kingdom
  • Planning process in the United States
  • Planning profession
  • Planning references in popular culture
  • Planning terminology
  • Planning theory
  • Professional associations
  • Professional certification
  • Public transportation
  • Public health planning
  • Public works
  • Redevelopment and revitalization
  • Regional planning
  • Research
  • Residential land use
  • Safety
  • Spatial Planning
  • Signs
  • Small town and rural planning
  • Smart growth
  • Social equity
  • Statistics
  • Strategic planning
  • Streetscapes
  • Subdivision
  • Suburbia
  • Surveys
  • Sustainability
  • Telecommunications
  • Tourism and resort planning
  • Transportation planning
  • United Kingdom planning process
  • Urban design
  • Urban thoery
  • Urbanism
  • Utilities
  • Watershed planning
  • Weblogs
  • Zoning and land use regulation

     1994-2009 Cyburbia       vBulletin 3.8.4 ©2000 - 2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by vbWiki Pro 1.0.2. Copyright ©2006, NuHit, LLC